I think generally, that I’m of faith. I also ascribe myself as a thinker, and I do not find that the Christian faith is in contradiction to being able to think independently.
Often, there are times when we question what we read, and we arrive at various understandings and outcomes, perhaps in violation of a literal reading of the bible. However, it has never left me conscious or uncomfortable that I was thinking “wrongly”, perhaps because its in my faith, that I believe that my thoughts were guided by the Lord and would reconcile with his will.
However, having read the daily devotion “The Thinking Christian”, I’m rather perturbed. The issue raised being “is independent thinking at odds with being Christian”. I fear however, the short write up fails to address the issue. It does state blatantly that as a Christian, we are inherently thinking. However, it does not demonstrate this in any of the following material. It insteads, seems to suggest that the an independent thinker is one who is able to refute arguments against God. While this is an appealing argument towards the prevailing “christian mindset” it would fail to convince anybody outside our faith. It hardly deals with an logic. It seems to suggests that in knowing the perfect knowledge of God, we are independent thinkers. This assumes that we know the perfect knowledge of God. Which, is never suggested in the Bible. It is suggested that we know of God’s perfect knowledge, but not the knowledge itself. How then can the blind defend?
It is writing like this that worries me. Self justifying pieces which appeal to believe and a higher power then logic, yet masquerading as a well articulated plea to reason. I can understand, the lay person’s aversed attitude towards our Christian faith, if these are the types of doctrine or documentation that they are exposed to.
I am offended, that some Christians see the need to deceive, by passing off a devotion clearly based on our believe alone, as a logically arrived one. An independent thinker, would likely reject this argument, whether or not we believe in it. That is not to say, that rejection of a logical flow is the same as a rejection of the message that is being delivered.
The article however, ends with a suitable quote one that I derive albeit, a different path from the writer of the article.
“Faith was never intended as a substitute for intelligence.”

The Thinking Christian
I think generally, that I’m of faith. I also ascribe myself as a thinker, and I do not find that the Christian faith is in contradiction to being able to think independently.
Often, there are times when we question what we read, and we arrive at various understandings and outcomes, perhaps in violation of a literal reading of the bible. However, it has never left me conscious or uncomfortable that I was thinking “wrongly”, perhaps because its in my faith, that I believe that my thoughts were guided by the Lord and would reconcile with his will.
However, having read the daily devotion “The Thinking Christian”, I’m rather perturbed. The issue raised, being “is independent thinking at odds with being Christian?”. I fear however, the short write up fails to address the issue. It does state blatantly that as a Christian, we are inherently thinking. However, it does not demonstrate this in any of the following material. It instead,provides a narrow perspective suggests the sole independent thinker is one who is able to refute arguments against God. While this is an appealing argument towards the prevailing “christian mindset” it would fail to convince anybody outside our faith. It hardly deals with a logic. It seems to suggests that in knowing the perfect knowledge of God, we are independent thinkers. This assumes that we know the perfect knowledge of God. Which, is never suggested in the Bible. It is suggested that we know of God’s perfect knowledge, but not the knowledge itself. How then can the blind defend? (To be noted hower, is that this article in an obtuse manner, probably unintended by the writer, coincides with my personal attitude towards thinking and faith.)
It is writing like this that worries me. Self justifying pieces which appeal to believe and a higher power then logic, yet masquerading as well articulated plea to reason. I can understand then, the lay person’s aversed attitude towards our Christian faith, if these are the types of doctrine or documentation that they are exposed to.
I am offended, that some Christians see the need to deceive, by passing off a devotion clearly based on our believe alone, as a logically arrived one. An independent thinker, would likely reject this argument, whether or notthey believe in it. That is not to say, that rejection of a logical flow is the same as a rejection of the message that is being delivered.
The article however, ends with a suitable quote one that I derive albeit, a different path from the writer of the article.
Faith was never intended as a substitute for intelligence.